Criteria

Little or no evidence

0-1 points

Some evidence

2-3 points

Compelling evidence

4 points

Impact

• Improved productivity or other enhancement of nominee's work

• Positive impact for other CATS, faculty, or students at nominee's campus

• Positive impact occurred or anticipated at other campuses

Effect on teaching and learning

• Enhanced faculty productivity

• Improved student outcomes

• Made better use of existing resources

• Created model, learning object, system, etc., that can be adopted at other campuses

• Introduced or implemented innovations in technology-mediated instruction

Distinctiveness

• Unique system, approach to implementation, etc.

• Creative solution to problem

Nominee's Role

• Participated as a valuable team member

• Provided leadership of project team

• Self-initiated or self-completed project

Size of the project team relative to scope and purpose

• Project completed by nominee working alone

• Team size small, yielding valuable results

• Team size large, nominee demonstrated exemplary organizational and management skills

Strength of support

• Relevant letters of support

• Specific and thorough understanding of nominee's role in project evident

Other